Search for: "U. S. Trustee" Results 241 - 260 of 431
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2013, 1:51 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Justice Freeman summed up his position succinctly: “[U]nder the majority’s decision the Board, a fiduciary, had no authority to perform its fiduciary function. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 7:20 pm by Larry Catá Backer
One of the most ambitious approaches I have encountered recently was put forward last year in an AAC&U publication by an international group of liberal arts college presidents. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 6:19 am by Jeffrey L. Rubinger
 Prior to 2007, liquidating distributions from a REIT or redemptions of a REIT’s shares generally were treated as a sale of the REIT’s shares. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 3:30 am by Peter Mahler
Appleby, 2013 NY Slip Op 31979(U) (Sup Ct NY County Aug. 20, 2013), decided last month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Melvin L. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:11 am by Scott Riddle
”) With respect to the Defendant’s argument that the Debtor did not have standing to pursue the fraudulent transfer claims, as the claims rightfully belonged to a trustee, the Court held that the Debtor had express authority pursuant to 11 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2013, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Whelan agreed with the defendants that plaintiff lacked standing, stating that property included in a bankrupt’s estate can be “abandoned” only where the trustee . . . [read post]
13 May 2013, 5:17 am by Russell DeMott
The United States Trustees Office announced that it has suspended debtor audits. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 4:20 pm by ipandentertainmentlaw
Jenkins and Tamera Bennett, the Advocacy Committee Chair, along with organization’s National Vice Chair, Christine Albert, Chapter Trustee Paul Wall and Chapter President Eric Jarvis will spearhead the event. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 11:03 pm by Peter Mahler
Cohen, 2013 NY Slip Op 50092(U) (Sup Ct Kings County Jan. 15, 2013), decided last month by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 6:36 am by Aaron Barkoff
 Drawing on Supreme Court precedent, amici argued that "[u]nder any definition, Bowman certainly 'made' infringing seeds in this case, even though he grew them rather than genetically engineering them from starting materials." [read post]