Search for: "U. S. v. Baum" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 5:09 am by SHG
The Sixth Circuit’s decision in Doe v. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schwartzman v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum & Vitulli  2019 NY Slip Op 30419(U)  January 14, 2019  Supreme Court, Queens County  Docket Number: 714510/2017  Judge: Joseph Risi takes the position that all the above are required. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Judge Kornreich, in 1993 Trust of Joan Cohen v Baum   2017 NY Slip Op 30894(U) May 2, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150058/2015 discusses how to determine whether the claim is direct or derivative. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schwartzman, Inc. v Pliskin, Rubano, Baum, & Vitulli, 215 A.D.3d 699 [2d Dept. 2023]; Park/ex Associates v Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer, LLP, 118 A.D.3d 698 [2d Dept.2014 ]). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Reem Contr. v Altschul & Altshcul 2022 NY Slip Op 34430(U) December 30, 2022 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 104202/2011 Judge: Kelly A. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
InEhrenhalt v Kinder; 2011 NY Slip Op 30375(U); February 15, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County ;Judge: Martin Shulman we see how things went bad: "At the time she signed the contract, Shapolsky tendered the contract deposit of $85,000 directly to Kinder. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Ehrenhalt v Kinder; 2011 NY Slip Op 30375(U); February 15, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County ;Judge: Martin Shulman we see how things went bad: "At the time she signed the contract, Shapolsky tendered the contract deposit of $85,000 directly to Kinder. [read post]
29 May 2012, 3:32 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Ehrenhalt v Kinder; 2011 NY Slip Op 30375(U); February 15, 2011; Supreme Court, New York County ;Judge: Martin Shulman we see how things went bad: "At the time she signed the contract, Shapolsky tendered the contract deposit of $85,000 directly to Kinder. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:59 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Lincoln First Bank, N.A. v Sanford, 173 AD2d 65 [4th Dept 1991] [“The principal issue raised on appeal is whether Surrogate’s Court has subject matter jurisdiction over a stockholder derivative action . . . . [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 9:34 am by Larry Ribstein
  We have a response, if not definitive answer, in VC Laster’s decision in Lonergan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
Rickey) in responding to Carney & Shepherd's criticism in Manufacturing Mystery: A Response to Professors Carney and Shepherd's "The Mystery of Delaware Law's Continuing Success (2009 U. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 2:59 pm
Segundo, el que gana conforme a las "reglas" se lleva un ejemplar de "La Corte Suprema" de Laurence Baum, un libro corto, difícil de encontrar, en castellano, algo viejo (ochentoso) pero ameno, profundo y apto para todo público. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 10:33 am
Civ. 99, 19/11/07, V. [read post]