Search for: "U. S. v. Candie"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 2:16 am
However, used descriptively is ruled legal [Mind Candy Ltd v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 6:46 am
U. of N. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 12:35 pm
See Seguros Afirme, S.A. de C.V. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:41 am
Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 7:42 pm
Zatarian's, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Wisconsin’s aggregate limits have already been challenged in Young v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
Superior Vending, LLC, 2008 NY Slip Op 51205(U) (June 6, 2008). [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 7:26 pm
Más de uno de nosotros recordamos nuestra infancia dejando en plena contienda un emocionante juego de “quemados” por prender el televisor y disfrutan 30 minutos de nuestra serie preferida, tales como Dragon Ball Z, Candy Candy, Los Caballeros del Zodiaco, entre otros. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
U. [read post]
16 May 2007, 9:51 am
General Mills v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 4:31 am
Roberts read a decision, from United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Justice Scheinkman's thorough, 26-page decision in White v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:28 am
Standard Candy Co., 2008 U.S. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 9:57 am
"From the Supreme Court's opinion today in Gill v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:38 am
Nestlé now owns the Willy Wonka Candy Factory and manufactures chocolates and sweets inspired by Roald Dahl’s creations. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
Under the descriptive fair use doctrine, a trademark can be used in its dictionary sense to describe the speaker’s own goods and services—that’s why Ocean Spray can market its cranberry juice as “sweet-tart” without infringing Nestle’s SweeTart trademark for candy. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
Things Remembered (Patently-O) US Copyright – Decisions Ninth Circuit rules that Bratz maker MGA Entertainment can continue selling its dolls despite having lost copyright infringement suit last year: MGA Entertainment v Mattel (IPKat) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Beyonce - Destiny’s Child and Beyonce settle Cater 2 U copyright dispute: Allen v Destiny’s Child (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) (Chicago… [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
