Search for: "U. S. v. Certilman"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2022, 4:34 am
Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d 788, 789, 51 N.Y.S.3d 183, 185 [2d Dept 2017] quoting Luk Lamellen U Kupplungbau GmbH v. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 3:06 am
“For the continuous representation doctrine to apply, ‘there must be clear indicia of an ongoing, continuous, developing, and dependant relationship between the client and the attorney’ ” (Stein Indus., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d at 789, quoting Luk Lamellen U. [read post]
27 May 2022, 3:57 am
” (Stein Indus., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP, 149 AD3d 788, 789 [2d Dept 2017].) [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
., Inc. v Certilman Balin Adler & Hyman, LLP 2017 NY Slip Op 02688 [149 AD3d 788] April 5, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department gives a cogent explanation. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Dukes, and Turner v. [read post]
