Search for: "U. S. v. Daniels"
Results 41 - 60
of 426
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2017, 1:02 am
Hawke, Arnold & Porter LLP, on Wednesday, January 4, 2017 Editor's Note: Daniel M. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
Hodges, (inWhat Obergefell Should Have Said (Yale U. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 6:13 am
Ehrlich, Daniel J. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 12:36 pm
A commenter named Daniel asks,this is my question for you:when a criminal def is represented by the public defenders office can she bring in to the office another attorney WITHOOUT the consent of the defendant THE ATTORNEY WORKS for the client, (farretta -v- calif 1975) it is the assistant of counsel that is found in the 6th amend.is this NOT a breach of ethics such as confidentiality attorney client privilege etc. i am seriously thinking about taking legal action against this PD… [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 11:11 am
Page 1 2008 NY Slip Op 50318(U) THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 10:09 am
” Cites to Prager U v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm
Danielle Citron, U. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:33 am
” [cite to Daniels v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:35 am
People v Austin 2021 NY Slip Op 30276(U) January 29, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 451533/2019 Judge: O. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am
Google; Prager U. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 3:26 am
Di Giacomo v Michael S. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
The Ninth Circuit rejected identical Lanham Act claims in Prager U. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 4:06 am
Off-duty police officer not acting in the performance of his or her duties at the time of his or her injury not eligible for General Municipal Law §207-c benefits Martin v Clarkstown, 2012 NY Slip Op 51482(U), Supreme Court, Rockland County [Not selected for publications in the Official Reports] Daniel Martin, a Clarkstown police officer, was injured in the line of duty and was approved for certain benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law Section §207-c. … [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Facebook and Prager U. v YouTube. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 2:37 am
Stipulations of settlement are favored by the courts and are not to be lightly set aside (see, e.g., Daniel v Daniel, 224 AD2d 573), especially, where, as here, the party seeking to vacate the stipulation was represented by counsel (See, Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 [1984]; see also, Town of Clarkstown v M.R.O. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 12:05 pm
Sinclair, Daniel. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 4:42 pm
Kindermann and Daniel S. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 7:47 am
The court affirmed the district court’s decision granting summary judgment and dismissing the lawsuit. nClosures, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:10 am
Daniels, supra,@ p. 153 U. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Medix Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
