Search for: "U. S. v. Davis" Results 1 - 20 of 422
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by fjhinojosa
Casto’s article Robert Jackson’s Critique of Trump v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am by INFORRM
” The regulator found that programmes presented by Jacob Rees-Mogg, Esther McVey and Philip Davies were news segments that which had no “exceptional justification. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Here the article invoked the same reasoning used by Chief Justice Marshall in United States v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
The Supreme Court’s Wetland Saga Continues July 13, 2023 | Monika U. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 10:36 am by John Coyle
Supreme Court’s decision in International Shoe Co. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Gastiaburo, 16 F.3d 582, 586 (4th Cir. 1994) (stating that “[u]nder the Supreme Court’s precedents, the fact that impoundment may have made it virtually impossible for anyone to drive the car away or to tamper with its contents is irrelevant to the constitutionality of a warrantless search . . . . [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by bndmorris
Brandon Beck was the guest speaker at the Duke University School of Law’s Second Amendment Seminar on October 10, 2023 (1 hr. 15 min.), talking about Davis, Rahimi, and the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
For the Georgia case’s purposes, the most relevant is Supremacy Clause immunity. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 N.Y.3d at 442, 835 N.Y.S.2d 534, 867 N.E.2d 385; Davis v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” Nevertheless, this claim is enunciated by the Court in Allard v Gumenick 2023 NY Slip Op 32696(U) August 4, 2023 Supreme Court, New York CountyDocket Number: Index No. 158750/2022 Judge: Lisa S. [read post]