Search for: "U. S. v. Eisenstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2009, 12:39 pm
Irwin Eisenstein, Petitioner, v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:12 pm
Eisenstein v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 6:41 am
However, tolling resulting from continuous representation ends “once the client is informed or otherwise put on notice of the attorney’s withdrawal from representation” (Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 170-171 [2001]; accord RJR Mech. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
In Jonns v Fischbarg 2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 4:21 am
In Jonns v Fischbarg 2019 NY Slip Op 31919(U) July 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 150729/2017 Judge Kathryn Freed gives a nice cogent explanation of two recurring legal malpractice principles. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 3:51 am
Eisenstein, D uane Morris LLP v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
S.2d 138 (1st Dept. 2007). [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 4:14 am
The doctrine also appreciates the client’s dilemma if required to sue the attorney while the latter’s representation on the matter at issue is ongoing (Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 167 [2001] [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:11 am
Here, in Elizabeth Arden, Inc. v Abelman, Frayne & Schwab , 2010 NY Slip Op 51836(U) Decided on October 22, 2010; Supreme Court, New York County; Fried, J. it is not so easy. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:12 am
” (Williamson v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 9 NY3d 1, 10 [2007], quoting Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 170 [2001] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 4:26 am
Inc. v Ruvoldt 2017 NY Slip Op 31232(U) June 8, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158764/2015 Judge: Jeffrey K. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
However, pursuant to the doctrine of continuous representation, the limitations period is tolled until the attorney’s continuing representation of the client with regard to the particular matter terminates (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 167-168; Aqua-Trol Corp. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:17 am
Mazal Manager, LLC v Herrick Feinstein LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 32305(U) July 29, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158840/2018 Judge: O. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:12 am
However, pursuant to the doctrine of continuous representation, the limitations period is tolled until the attorney’s continuing representation of the client with regard to the particular matter terminates (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 167-168; Aqua-Trol Corp. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:26 am
In Komolov v Popik 2020 NY Slip Op 30909(U) April 7, 2020 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155100/2017 Judge: Barbara Jaffe determines that both prior Supreme Court judges and Appellate Division panels made fundamental mistakes. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 4:05 am
“However, pursuant to the doctrine of continuous representation, the time within which to sue on the claim is tolled until the attorney’s continuing representation of the client with regard to the particular matter terminates” (Aqua-Trol Corp. v Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer, P.A., 144 AD3d at 957; see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d at 164; Pellati v Lite & Lite, 290 AD2d 544, 545 [2002]). [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
Realty, LLC v Norris, McLaughlin, & Marcus, P.C. 2023 NY Slip Op 31851(U) June 2, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 155004/2022 Judge: Lori S. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:47 am
Eisenstein, 96 N.Y.2d 164, 168 (2001). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 2:54 am
(Shumsky v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 3:27 am
Eisenstein 96 NY2d 164, 167- 168 (2001); CPLR 214(6J). [read post]