Search for: "U. S. v. English"
Results 1 - 20
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2017, 1:22 pm
Alvarez, 546 U. [read post]
19 May 2018, 2:29 pm
Pullum, Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, ch. 8, §§1, 12.2, pp. 669, 729–730 (2002); Black’s Law Dictionary 1543 (10th ed. 2014); Oxford English Dictionary 504 (2d ed. 1989); Webster’s New International Dictionary 2220 (2d ed. 1950). [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:50 am
The English Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Lamesa Investments Limited v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:27 pm
See, e.g., Oxford English Dictionary 669 (2d ed. 1989) (defining “obtain” to mean, among other things, “to come into the possession or enjoyment of (something) by one’s own effort or by request”); Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:32 am
“Plaintiff’s claims arise from an underlying action captioned Shahin Guliyev v. [read post]
8 Apr 2020, 1:56 am
” The decision brings U.S. law into alignment with the long-standing position under English law, as established by Leeds Shipping Co. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
In McCoy v Louisiana, 584 U. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:57 am
The decision in Allianz v West Tankers represents an extension of Turner v Grovit insofar as it prohibits the issue of anti-suit injunctions in support of English arbitration as well as jurisdiction agreements. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 12:26 pm
(U. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:23 am
S. 308, Little v. [read post]
14 Apr 2020, 12:00 am
Kansas, 589 U. [read post]
30 Sep 2016, 6:42 am
After weighing all of the problems U visa discovery might cause against the employer’s admittedly significant interest in obtaining the discovery, the Fifth Circuit ordered the district court on remand to devise an approach to U visa discovery that adequately protects the diverse and competing interests at stake in this high profile case (Cazorla v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:25 am
My 11th grade English teacher* sent me a Facebook message a couple of weeks ago asking for assistance in locating the records and briefs from Brown v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Analyzing the Results of the Michigan Juror Comprehension Project, 23 U. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Analyzing the Results of the Michigan Juror Comprehension Project, 23 U. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
Analyzing the Results of the Michigan Juror Comprehension Project, 23 U. [read post]
21 May 2013, 8:30 am
S. 347 (1964), and Rogers v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
Graham, 383 U. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
Slip Op. 50479(U), Petitioner R.S. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
In doing so, he turns to the 1765 English case of Entick v. [read post]
