Search for: "U. S. v. Garrett"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2023, 9:22 am
That’s the question the prosecutor asked a witness in State v Gibbs. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:22 am
”The court then said that Garrett’s probationary termination was justified by an incident during the probationary period. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:41 am
While there, listen to Wallace’s recording and view a 1979 U-matic videocassette entitled Langdell Legends, featuring numerous HLS professors, and Erwin Griswold]. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 4:39 am
At Pro Publica, Kara Brandeisky and Mike Tigas track the status of state voting laws since the Court’s decision earlier this year in Shelby County v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
The U-T San Diego and Marcia Coyle of the Blog of Legal Times cover last week’s cert. grants in Riley v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:34 am
’” Garrett, Civil Case No. 10-cv-00385-WJM-BNB (citing LVRC Holdings LLC v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrimination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett (8 ADD ¶8-198). [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:44 pm
S. 277, 289-290 (1983); see Rummel v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 5:45 am
See Letter and Attachment from Judith Simon Garrett, U. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Garrett. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:09 pm
Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
Jeffords v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
U. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
” Yesterday’s second argument was in Koons v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 5:30 am
As UB Law Professor Garrett Epps explains in The Atlantic, “[u]nder Supreme Court rules, it takes four justices to grant review of a case, but five to grant a stay of a lower-court ruling. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 4:40 am
Garrett, 139 Fed. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:17 am
The Complainant in PETSENSE, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 12:24 pm
California, 403 U. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]