Search for: "U. S. v. Gomez"
Results 1 - 20
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2024, 4:59 am
., Inc. v Siegel & Reiner, LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 50292(U) Decided on March 20, 2024 Supreme Court, Bronx County Gomez, J. is the kind of legal malpractice case that comes up often enough to support the idea that real estate in NYC is a paramount, driving economic force, and that the extensive lawyering necessary results in many legal malpractice cases. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:25 am
Van Ravenstein v Ponder 2023 NY Slip Op 33072(U) September 6, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 161420/2019 is an interesting opinion from Judge Shlomo S. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 4:00 pm
On October 11, 2022, the Commercial Division Justice for Bronx County, Justice Gomez, issued a decision on a motion to dismiss in Chen v Fox Rehab. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:23 am
Group II LLC v Nabe (2022 NY Slip Op 30399[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2022]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
U. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 10:44 pm
Cuno, 547 U. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 8:09 am
Y con memoria: año 1964, Estadio Nacional Jerry Gomez Shor Jr. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
EEOC, 565 U. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 8:29 am
(The court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
Rene-Gomez, 2019 WL 4933687 (Wash. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 5:22 am
Pena and Gomez accompanied each client to the Schwitzer Firm’s office, where they met with Schwitzer, Merlino, Semel-Weinstein, and Diamond (id., iii! [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
U-Haul Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rohrmoos Venture v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 2:34 pm
See Gomez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 10:30 am
Gomez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 3:50 am
See Gomez v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:32 pm
S. 90 (1967); Schlagenhauf v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
Session, 17-820, Gomez-Ureaba v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
United States 17-6856 Issue: Whether the “separate sovereign” concept actually exists when Congress’s plenary power over Indian tribes and the general erosion of any real tribal sovereignty is amplified by the Northern Cheyenne Tribe’s constitution in such a way that the petitioner’s prosecutions in both tribal and federal court violate the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U. [read post]
