Search for: "U. S. v. Hoffman" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
In Port Jefferson Union Free School District v United Aides and Assistants,U-5713, PERB rejected a union's claim that every written criticism of an employee was a "reprimand. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
Epstein, Coniston Corp v Village of Hoffman Hills: How to Make Procedural Due Process Disappear, 74 U Chi L Rev 1689 (2007) Jacob E. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Just as the roof proved inadequate to the task, so the proofs on plaintiff’s case were inadequate to the claim in Petre v Alouidor & Assoc. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 10:23 am
The recent overdose death of actor Philip Seymour Hoffman brings into sharper relief the issue decided by the Supreme Court last week in Burrage v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
You warm up to them easily hahah but can't talk to a guy that uve known for 7 years ... and were in a relationship and wanted to marry and start a family with ....again u said the above text that's why I'm say in this to you ....jus hurts that u ignore.Patel: YES! [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Disciplinary charges filed in an earlier disciplinary action in which the employee was found not guilty considered in a subsequent disciplinary actionHoffmann v Department of Educ. of City of N.Y., 2004 NY Slip Op 51952(U), Supreme Court, Kings County, not officially reported, Affd., 21 A.D.3d 493Education Law § 3020-a (4) (b) requires that charges of which the employee has been acquitted be expunged from his or her "personnel records. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am by Kevin Johnson
The government relies on the 1982 case Village of Hoffman Estates v. [read post]
16 Apr 2011, 4:52 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Wilson, but even that limited rule was never accepted by a majority.For tomorrow's NYT, law professors Joseph Hoffman of Indiana U. and Nancy King of Vanderbilt have this op-ed. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:38 am by Charles Kotuby
At oral argument, the justices strongly questioned whether the Act should extend to reach such conduct, and gave strong indications that it was prepared to apply the territorial limitations of Hoffman-La Rouche v. [read post]