Search for: "U. S. v. Lawrence" Results 181 - 200 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 10:00 pm by Michael
Bettinger-López, the Human Rights Clinic, and the ACLU currently represent Gonzales in Jessica Gonzales v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 9:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 It took the high court 17-years to reverse the dubious Bowers decision in the seminal 2003 case of Lawrence v Texas, which expressly overruled their prior decision as defining the liberty and privacy interests of two consenting adults too narrowly to survive a Due Process analysis.There is also a notion that gay-marriage was removed via the ballot box and that's where the battle should be won. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 It took the high court 17-years to reverse the dubious Bowers decision in the seminal 2003 case of Lawrence v Texas, which expressly overruled their prior decision as defining the liberty and privacy interests of two consenting adults too narrowly to survive a Due Process analysis.There is also a notion that gay-marriage was removed via the ballot box and that's where the battle should be won. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Continuing the blogosphere’s running analysis of  Citizens United,  How Appealing posts an article by Lawrence Hurley of the LA Daily Journal. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
A certain kind of original-intent theory was self-defeating if Powell's historical analysis was correct. [read post]