Search for: "U. S. v. Marks" Results 1 - 20 of 1,452
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2023, 9:24 am by Marcel Pemsel
Applying for the right kind of mark is crucial for successfully defending the trade mark, as the recent General Court judgment in DPG Deutsche Pfandsystem v EUIPO - Užstato sistemos administratorius (case T-774/21) shows. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 1:52 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Mark Killenbeck, author of several excellent legal histories, including one on M’Culloch v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 1:17 pm by Daily Record Staff
While Hatmaker’s body was never found, his blood was found on two motor vehicles: on the bumper of a U-Haul truck ... [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:20 am by The Docket Navigator
The court granted defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's qui tam false marking claim "on the ground that the qui tam provision of 35 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 1:27 pm
TrademarkBooking.comGeneric NameGeneric Name to ConsumersEvidence of Consumer PerceptionService Mark v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:02 am by Michaela Ring (Hoffmann Eitle)
Urt. v. 2.6.2022 – 6 U 40/22, GRUR-RS 2022, 22858   The trade mark owner claimed that his trade mark rights had been infringed, and he applied for injunctive remedies. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Supreme Court addressed the Constitution’s Contracts Clause for the first time in 25 years in Sveen v Melin, 584 U. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 4:52 am by Woodrow Pollack
No.A jury agreed with PODS that U-Haul infringed the "pods" trademark and that U-Haul was unable to prove that the mark was generic. [read post]
9 May 2016, 3:17 am
" The mark comprises the configuration of the U-shaped channel that runs the length of the door. [read post]