Search for: "U. S. v. Mcdowell"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Joanna Julius was riding as a passenger in her parents’ car in McDowell County when the person driving the car crashed it into a ditch filled with water. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 10:33 am
Jones, to indecency in FCC v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
The case is McDowell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 2:56 am
In this way, the assessee claimed deduction u/s 80-M and then he claimed deduction on account of loss against business income also. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:05 am
WCAB (McDowell), 730 A.2d 562 (Pa. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 2:42 pm
McDowell, 713 F.3d 571 (U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:18 am
McDowell, 256 U.S. 465 (1921)). [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:05 am
WCAB (McDowell), 730 A.2d 562 (Pa. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 4:01 am
In procedural matters, particularly on the issue of reopening U/s. 148, assesses had found relief in a Full Bench decision in Kelvinator’s case (256 ITR 1, subsequently approved by the Supreme Court). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) … [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
(Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) False marking and patent reform (Patently-O) US Patents Patent marking police strike again - 100 companies now affected by false marking suits (GRAY on Claims) The marking requirement: Here is how the statute has been interpreted (Patently-O) Investigating Patent Law’s presumption of validity - An empirical analysis (Patently-O) Inventors Eye: The Patent Office’s new publication for inventors (Patent Baristas) … [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
David Hudson (Belmont University College of Law) filed an amicus brief written on behalf of the Electronic Frontier Foundation by UCLA Amicus Brief Clinic students Megan McDowell, Emily Rehm, and Brenna Scully and me. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:23 pm
Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
The consortium consists of members of the law school and/or history faculties at the University of Minnesota, Indiana University, University of Illinois, University of Michigan, and the University of Pennsylvania in addition to the U of C and the ABF. [read post]
