Search for: "U. S. v. Mckinney" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2020, 6:03 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Papers on SSRN with American Indian law subjects, either unpublished or recently published: Agency Pragmatism in Addressing Law’s Failure: The Curious Case of Federal ‘Deemed Approvals’ of Tribal-State Gaming Compacts 52 U. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
John’s Riverside Hosp., 162 AD2d 140, 140 (1st Dept 1990); Kolb v Strogh, 15 8 AD2d 15, 22 (2d Dept 1990). [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
McKinney, 361 N.C. 53 (2006) (remanding case to trial court for determination of whether warrant was valid notwithstanding warrant application’s inclusion of information gained in unlawful search) and State v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 7:33 pm
Co. v Szeli, 83 NY2d 681, 686 [1994], quoting Mem of St Exec Dept, 1977 McKinney's Session Laws of NY at 2446). [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  in Cheong v Lau  2012 NY Slip Op 30725(U)  March 1, 2012  Supreme Court, Queens County  Docket Number: 22266/09  Judge: Darrell L. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in Krigsman v Goldberg  2018 NY Slip Op 30694(U)  April 19, 2018  Supreme Court, New York County  Docket Number: 151271 /16  Judge: Manuel J. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
See, most significantly: McKinney v University of Guelph, 1990 CanLII 60 (SCC), [1990] 3 SCR 229 at 270–271. [22] The next question is whether the University is “government” because the government proper exercises substantial control over it. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
457 Warburton Ave, LLC v Monna Lissa, LLC 2024 NY Slip Op 30423(U) February 7, 2024Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 651358/2020 Judge: Louis L. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 3:30 pm
The fact that the Legislature has explicitly named a class of persons who are to be benefited by a ratable distribution of insurance proceeds raises an inference that the omission of such a provision with respect to others was intentional (see McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book 1, Statutes, § 240; see David v Bauman, 24 Misc 2d 67).Where section 370 is not applicable and there is no pro rata provision in the policy, the contest of… [read post]