Search for: "U. S. v. Parker" Results 21 - 40 of 102
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
The FDA’s M7 Guidance observes that “[s]tandard risk assessments of known carcinogens assume that cancer risk increases as a function of cumulative dose. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 3:33 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Agregó que “[u]na empresa que toma la decisión de moderarse a sí misma es diferente a un gobierno que le quita el acceso (a alguien), pero puede percibirse casi igual“5. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Speculative assertions that the defendant’s conduct caused the plaintiff’s damages do not suffice. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 3:12 pm by John Floyd
Penalty Provisions of Federal Gun Law Struck Down   In the opening line of a June 24, 2019 ruling in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”‘ (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, LP., v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimp, LLP, 265 AD2d at 210.) [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ctr., 120 AD3d 932 [4th Dept 2014); Parker & Waichman v Napoli, 29 AD3d 396, 399 [1st Dept 2006); Vinokur v Penny Lane Owners Corp., 269 AD2d 226 [1st Dept 2000)). [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
(See Voluto Ventures, LLC v Jenkens & Gilchrist Parker Chapin LLP, 46 AD3d 354, 355 [1st Dept 2007] [evidence of other factors contributing to loss not considered at pleading stage, but plaintiff must allege that legal malpractice was proximate cause of damages]). [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division agreed, explaining that arbitration awards are entitled to collateral estoppel effect and, citing Guard-Life Corp. v Parker Hardware Mfg. [read post]