Search for: "U. S. v. Patterson" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2009, 4:18 am
App. 1997) (holding the DNA evidence should not be "suppressed on the basis that additional testing of defendant's blood ... required an independent warrant"); Patterson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
" No, according to the Court of Appeal's rulings in Holt v Board of Education, 52 NY2d 625 and in Patterson v Smith, 53 NY2d 98. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 10:55 am
Here, there was no testimony supporting the likely presence of weapons other than the officer's bare assertion that "[u]sually where there are drugs, we find guns. [read post]