Search for: "U. S. v. Pecora"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2007, 11:26 am
Rather than defending against a wrongful death claim, Pecora's estate simply argued the estate had no significant assets: the estate's most valuable asset (a one-half stake in the business) went directly to Pecora's surviving spouse as TBE property. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:26 am
Rather than defending against a wrongful death claim, Pecora's estate simply argued the estate had no significant assets: the estate's most valuable asset (a one-half stake in the business) went directly to Pecora's surviving spouse as TBE property. [read post]
20 Oct 2007, 11:26 am
Rather than defending against a wrongful death claim, Pecora's estate simply argued the estate had no significant assets: the estate's most valuable asset (a one-half stake in the business) went directly to Pecora's surviving spouse as TBE property. [read post]
