Search for: "U. S. v. Perez*"
Results 1 - 20
of 122
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
In Perez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 2:32 pm
U-Haul Co. of California, denying the defendant company’s move to compel its workers to arbitrate their representative Private Attorney General Act claims for wage-and-hour violations. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 9:44 am
U-Haul Co. of California (Sept. 16, 2016), the Second Appellate District, Division Seven, affirmed the trial Court's ruling that U-Haul could not assert an arbitration agreement to compel the plaintiffs to individually arbitrate whether they qualified as “aggrieved employee[s],” to determine in arbitration whether they had standing to pursue a PAGA claim.The Court agreed with Williams v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
S. 576, and Shalala v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:44 am
S. 576, and Shalala v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:01 am
As noted previously on this blog, the U. [read post]
16 May 2016, 5:23 pm
S. 452 (1997), and Bowles v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:35 am
,S. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:30 am
Circuit’s Paralyzed Veterans doctrine. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 12:38 am
A recent California Court of Appeal decision issued in Perez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 12:38 am
A recent California Court of Appeal decision issued in Perez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 3:55 am
(Opinion, United States Supreme Court, 598 U. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 3:55 am
(Opinion, United States Supreme Court, 598 U. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am
Facebook and Prager U. v YouTube. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 7:24 am
Google; Prager U. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 7:15 am
The Ninth Circuit rejected identical Lanham Act claims in Prager U. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 7:09 am
The court says Prager U expressly rejected that argument. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:21 am
Federal courts have uniformly rejected attempts to treat similar social media companies as state actors under Section 1983 [cites to Prager U v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 3:00 am
Here, in Cascardo v Dratel 2021 NY Slip Op 30667(U) March 4, 2021 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 101055/2017 Judge: Erika M. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:33 am
This argument is foreclosed by Prager U. v. [read post]