Search for: "U. S. v. Pike" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2018, 12:16 pm by Daniel K. McClendon
  Second, the Senators argued that the overturn of Quill would not mean the Court could not protect interstate sellers though other doctrines, such as the balancing test in Pike v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has an interesting post on “medical privacy” dealing with the case of ABC v St George’s Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (2017) EWCA Civ 336 which concludes that clinicians treating a patient with Huntingdon’s disease have an arguable duty to disclose the diagnosis to the patient’s daughters. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 12:02 pm by JohnFinnerty
  (DLP) representa a las víctimas de accidentes lesionadas gravemente y catastróficamente en accidentes de carro, de autobuses, camiones, motocicletas, camiones, y camiones con remolque a través del Nordeste de Pensilvania, incluyendo los Condados de Lackawanna, Luzerne, Monroe, Pike, Wayne, Wyoming, Sullivan, Montour, Lycoming, Schuykill, Tioga, Bradford, Susquehanna, Northampton, Carbon, y Columbia. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
" In Pike, the Court allowed a five-level guideline increase based only on proof by a preponderance, citing to a pre-Booker case (Riley) in which the defendant agreed that the preponderance standard applied. [read post]