Search for: "U. S. v. Pollack" Results 1 - 10 of 10
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Macaluso v Pollack , 2010 NYSlipOp 30276(U) , Justice Diamond, Nassau County, presents an interesting story of how a case can get dismissed. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 5:40 am
The Court of Appeals began its analysis of these arguments by explaining that[u]nder Georgia law, liability for the tort of a minor child is not imputed to the child's parents merely on the basis of the parent-child relationship. [read post]
24 May 2019, 4:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  This is amply demonstrated by Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C. v Pollack  2019 NY Slip Op 50793(U)  Decided on May 17, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County  Reed, J.. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 7:36 am by sevach
Tampoco parece que las consultas médicas privadas estén mas huérfanos de clientes que los despachos de los abogados u otros profesionales cuyas titulaciones no están sometidas a numerus clausus. 3. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]