Search for: "U. S. v. Rodriguez"
Results 41 - 60
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 3:20 am
In Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
Ortega-Rodriguez, 507 U. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
” As the Court has said repeatedly, most recently in 2015’s King v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 4:05 am
U. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 3:41 am
” These allegations fail to specify “ascertainable damages,” Rudolph at 443, and it is no more than “an insufficient speculation” (Rodriguez v Lipsig, Shapey, Manus & Moverman, P,C., 81 AD3d 551, 557 [1st Dept 2011]) that Carter, who had failed to pay his New York counsel, and then failed to pay a settlement of that counsel’s claim, would have prevailed in that counsel’s subsequent suit. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:46 am
(Eugene Volokh) Dariano v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:29 am
These provocative policy questions at the heart of hiQ Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:37 pm
Texas previously was obliged to get such approval under the 1965 Voting Rights Act, but that regime ended with the Supreme Court’s ruling in June in Shelby County v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:53 am
Lynch v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:29 pm
Redmond, 518 U .S. 1, 9-10 (1996). [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 5:35 am
September 6, 2011).* Defendant’s car made a u-turn just before a border checkpoint in Texas. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 7:14 am
University May Be Liable for Improper Access to Student’s Facebook Photos – Rodriguez v. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
But in 2017, in Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
Rodriguez, 138 S. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:24 pm
Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Fernandez v Rodriguez, 180 AD3d 897, the Appellate Division said that the hearing officer resolved the issue of credibility as between the two witnesses, and it discerned "no basis to disturb that determination. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Fernandez v Rodriguez, 180 AD3d 897, the Appellate Division said that the hearing officer resolved the issue of credibility as between the two witnesses, and it discerned "no basis to disturb that determination. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:22 am
” In an interview at PRI, Kevin Johnson discusses the court’s decision this week in Jennings v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
S. 3, 20 (1997); internal quotation marks omitted); see Rodriguez de Quijas v. [read post]
