Search for: "U. S. v. Samples"
Results 1 - 20
of 220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2014, 3:53 pm
Authored by Jim Harris The California Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Duran v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:38 am
Bank in Duran v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 3:24 am
The Court concluded that since the statute was ambiguous and the Secretary’s interpretation reasonable, the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 3:40 pm
The High Court in Missouri v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 8:56 am
Quon decided; city’s access of employee’s text messages was reasonable under O’Connor v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:25 am
Many observers saw the proverbial writing on the wall for Duran with the Supreme Court’s Brinker decision, which endorsed the type of sampling and statistical methods received skeptically in Duran. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 8:41 am
Although New Jersey’s refusal statute does not impose criminal penalties or require blood testing, the court’s ruling in Birchfield v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:04 pm
In DUI cases (called ‘OVI’ in Ohio), a defendant’s blood or urine sample may be tested by a crime lab to determine the concentration of alcohol and/or drugs in the sample. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 12:22 pm
Maryland’s decision conflicts with decisions of the U. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 2:15 pm
Bounds in the U. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:03 pm
United States, 335 U. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 11:53 am
In accordance with §2-504(3) of the Maryland DNA Collection Act, King’s DNA was collected, analyzed, and entered into Maryland’s DNA database. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 1:30 pm
August 12, 2020 U.S. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 11:00 am
As discussed previously in this space, we have been eagerly awaiting the Supreme Court’s decision in Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 4:04 pm
On March 22, 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided Tyson Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:46 pm
The USSC ruled in 1966’s Schmerber v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:52 pm
Maryland's decision conflicts with decisions of the U. [read post]
