Search for: "U. S. v. Shepard" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 2:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Datatreasury Corp. v Del Col; 2012 NY Slip Op 31913(U); July 5, 2012; Sup Ct, Suffolk County Docket Number: 11-26774; Judge: John J.J. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Google Scholar: most cited capital punishment cases - CWRU Law patrons may use Shepard's on Lexis and KeyCite on Westlaw to find additional research resources. [read post]
11 May 2010, 9:14 am by Carl Folsom
Then, "[u]nder Shepard, if a discrepancy exists, the government bears the burden of producing documents from the prior case and establishing that the defendant admitted or the jury found that the offense involved conduct triggering the enhancement. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 8:49 am
The article is old, so there's some updating and shepardizing to do. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm by Jamie Markham
If a person’s record indicates that he or she has a conviction for divisible offense, the modified categorical approach allows the court to look at certain official documents—such as the indictment or a written plea agreement, see Shepard v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm by Jamie Markham
If a person’s record indicates that he or she has a conviction for divisible offense, the modified categorical approach allows the court to look at certain official documents—such as the indictment or a written plea agreement, see Shepard v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
Justice Ginsburg provided the clear law: "[U]nder the Sixth Amendment, any fact that exposes a defendant to a greater potential sentence must be found by a jury, not a judge, and established beyond a reasonable doubt, not merely by a preponderance of the evidence. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
" KSR's brief never cited In re Kotzab, 217 F.3d 1365, or Ruiz v. [read post]