Search for: "U. S. v. Smith" Results 41 - 60 of 682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
All the non-tax liability claims in Treanor v Dimopoulos 2023 NY Slip Op 32260(U)July 5, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 159106/2022Judge: Mary V. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am by Joseph L. Hyde
Hyde and Brittany Bromell, respectively, will be added to Smiths Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
” Specifically, it was stipulated among parties that Smiths websites would express and communicate ideas, primarily those that “celebrate and promote the couple’s wedding and unique love story” and those that “celebrat[e] and promot[e]” what Smith understands to be marriage. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 8:00 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smiths Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Heron at Suffolk University’s Sawyer Business School, Hagit Levy at Baruch College’s Zicklin School of Business, and Emanuel Zur at the University of Maryland’s Smith School of Business. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
Brest's article initiated an intense theoretical debate over the merits of originalism that continues today. [read post]
1 May 2023, 10:44 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jaune Smith — it’s as if I took a lot of close-up shots at a Whitney exhibition of her work. . . . [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Kupferman’s decision in Celia v Celia (2023 NY Slip Op 30995(U) [Sup Ct, Saratoga County Mar. 31, 2013]). [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 6:36 pm by Jeanne Huang
The high profile nature of the case suggests that the First circuit might address the extent of PLCAA’s scope of application, including whether the district court’s interpretation was “impermissibly extraterritorial”. [read post]