Search for: "U. S. v. Tate"
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am
It’s an interesting case in its own right as an application of U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
Altmann, 541 U. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 3:41 pm
Alabama, 567 U. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Rucho v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:00 am
Simpson Tate, George Hayes. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 4:41 pm
Proc. 23, 28 U. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 11:19 am
Western Sugar Co-op. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
The decision in Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U) [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] suggests that a court could deem a retirement to be the equivalent of a resignation for the purposes of 4 NYCRR 5.3(b). [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 6:06 am
Tate, 821 F.2d 1328 (U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
The parties expressly agreed that the employees in the 250 positions, which were listed in an attached appendix, were "not assigned to any duties that would bring them within the definition of managerial and/or confidential under [Civil Service Law] §201.7(a)" and that the individuals in those positions "share[d] a general community of interest with other [s]tate employees in the P S and T [u]nit. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
It is clear that "[t]he only 'conduct' which the [s]tate sought to punish is the fact of communication. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
California viewed Cohen's display of "Fuck the Draft" on his jacket as "speech";[140] City of Ladue v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:55 pm
Whether that temptation was to tip the scale in one direction or the other, the balance could not remain nice, clear and true between the [s]tate and the accused. ... [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
Litig., 2019 NY Slip Op. 33515(U) at *1 [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Given that “[s]tates rarely relinquish their sovereign powers,” she asserts, the Supreme Court has required “a clear statement in a compact that they have done so”. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 1:21 pm
, 162 U. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 3:45 am
Courtesy of Tate. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm
“[S]tate courts are the ultimate expositors of state law. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:33 am
`The [s]tate's rebuttal evidence . . . may not include other traits or that which merely reflects on the accused's general good or bad character. [read post]