Search for: "U. S. v. Tate" Results 1 - 20 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2018, 8:09 am by Phil Dixon
It’s an interesting case in its own right as an application of U.S. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 10:00 am by Erin Miller
Simpson Tate, George Hayes. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The decision in Blair v Horn, 2008 NY Slip Op 32581(U) [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] suggests that a court could deem a retirement to be the equivalent of a resignation for the purposes of 4 NYCRR 5.3(b). [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The parties expressly agreed that the employees in the 250 positions, which were listed in an attached appendix, were "not assigned to any duties that would bring them within the definition of managerial and/or confidential under [Civil Service Law] §201.7(a)" and that the individuals in those positions "share[d] a general community of interest with other [s]tate employees in the P S and T [u]nit. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It is clear that "[t]he only 'conduct' which the [s]tate sought to punish is the fact of communication. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
California viewed Cohen's display of "Fuck the Draft" on his jacket as "speech";[140] City of Ladue v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 5:55 pm
Whether that temptation was to tip the scale in one direction or the other, the balance could not remain nice, clear and true between the [s]tate and the accused. ... [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Bernard Bell
  Given that “[s]tates rarely relinquish their sovereign powers,” she asserts, the Supreme Court has required “a clear statement in a compact that they have done so”. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 2:42 pm by Russell Knight
“[S]tate courts are the ultimate expositors of state law. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:33 am by Susan Brenner
`The [s]tate's rebuttal evidence . . . may not include other traits or that which merely reflects on the accused's general good or bad character. [read post]