Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 180
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Collective bargaining under the Taylor Law: submitting demands characterized as new or regressive after post-impasse fact-findingBuffalo Teachers Federation v Buffalo City School District, PERB U-34445Buffalo City School District v Buffalo Teachers Federation, PERB U-34462 On July 21, 2015, The Buffalo Teachers Federation [BTF] filed an improper practice charge with the New York Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 4:36 am
Activities by teachers in the course of collective bargaining are not protected activities within the meaning of the Taylor Law when such activities place students at riskLucia v Board of Educ. of the E. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 4:15 am
Dismissal during an employee's disciplinary probationary periodMatter of Bradford v New York City Dept. of Correction, 2006 NY Slip Op 30569(U), July 11, 2006, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 111044/05, Judge: Debra A. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:49 am
Union can require non-members to contribute to union’s legal feesLocke et al. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]