Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor*" Results 21 - 40 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Court of Appeal Rules Facebook’s Fine Print Trumps Privacy Law http://t.co/7SmkSxPaNo -> [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:15 am
Demand for premium pay where union cannot negotiate a disciplinary procedure a mandatory subject of collective bargainingMatter of City of New York v New York State Public Employment Relations Board, 2008 NY Slip Op 52693(U), Decided on January 18, 2008, Supreme Court, Albany County, Judge Henry F. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
On April 24, 2013, petitioner received a revised U-Rating that changed the date of the principal's and district superintendent's signatures to April 22, 2013.The Department of Education discontinued petitioner's probationary employment as of May 29, 2013, a month before the school year ended. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:24 pm by Lisa Baird
This most recent Communication recognizes the importance of trans-Atlantic data flows, calling the EU and the United States “each other’s most important trading partners”; but acknowledges that the CJEU’s judgment “reaffirms the importance of the right to protection of personal data. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Dismissed probationary teacher presents evidence sufficient to require judicial review of whether termination was made in bad faithLisa Capece f/k/a Lisa Grande v Schultz, 2009 NY Slip Op 51679(U), Decided on August 3, 2009, Supreme Court, Richmond County, Judge Philip G. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/XMMpMQomkl -> John Degen: The book stops here http://t.co/5Ps2TRgmWY -> It’s Illegal For Offline Retailers To Collect Email Addresses–Capp v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am by Dave
 This point was argued for Ms Watts by Mark Wonnacott QC (who argued successfully for the tenant in Mexfield Housing Co-Op v Berrisford), whose The History of Landlord and Tenant should have been on everybody’s Santa list. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This sum is based upon, inter alia, the Husband's current earnings and business, the parties' pre-divorce lifestyle, the Husband's required payment of pendente lite maintenance for four years, and the fact that the Wife is currently employed (see Graves v. [read post]