Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor*" Results 41 - 60 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, (U Denver Legal Studies Research Paper, Working Paper No. 17-39 (Nov. 2017)).Ian S. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:31 am
(Case U-4642, Matter of Nassau County Chapter CSEA) Scott v Wetzler, 195 AD2d 905, illustrates an application of the general rule that except in life-threatening situations, or in situations where the employee is asked to perform a clearly unlawful act, if an employee objects to complying with a superior's directive, he or she should "work now, grieve later. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
There’s been plenty of commentary on Sessions v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 3:28 am
According to Philips, Nintendo’s Wii and Wii U consoles infringed three of its patents relating to the interaction between users’ physical bodies and the virtual tennis character that one of Nintendo’s video games allows you to become. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am by Ronald Collins
Sharp and the Supreme Court’s 1967 opinion in Loving v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 3:56 am
In Port Jefferson Union Free School District v United Aides and Assistants,U-5713, PERB rejected a union's claim that every written criticism of an employee was a "reprimand. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 8:40 am
The Cincinnati law student's soundly researched and well argued article can be found here; it has been published at 75 U. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm by Jon L. Gelman
S. ___, ___, or who “become[s] a party by intervention, substitution, or third-party practice,” Karcher v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:26 am
Prohibited subjects of arbitrationMatter of County of Chautauqua v Civil Serv. [read post]