Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor*" Results 41 - 60 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2016, 3:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
On April 24, 2013, petitioner received a revised U-Rating that changed the date of the principal's and district superintendent's signatures to April 22, 2013.The Department of Education discontinued petitioner's probationary employment as of May 29, 2013, a month before the school year ended. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rothstein v Krane LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 30016(U) January 3, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157694/2017 Judge: Gerald Lebovits is that very rare species of summary judgment in a legal malpractice case in favor of plaintiff. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 4:10 am
Dismissed probationary teacher presents evidence sufficient to require judicial review of whether termination was made in bad faithLisa Capece f/k/a Lisa Grande v Schultz, 2009 NY Slip Op 51679(U), Decided on August 3, 2009, Supreme Court, Richmond County, Judge Philip G. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/XMMpMQomkl -> John Degen: The book stops here http://t.co/5Ps2TRgmWY -> It’s Illegal For Offline Retailers To Collect Email Addresses–Capp v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:57 am by Florian Mueller
Koh's findings of fact, conclusions of law, and remedial ordersJay Jurata (Partner, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe)Licensing practitioner's perspective on fallout from FTC v. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 1:05 am by Dave
 This point was argued for Ms Watts by Mark Wonnacott QC (who argued successfully for the tenant in Mexfield Housing Co-Op v Berrisford), whose The History of Landlord and Tenant should have been on everybody’s Santa list. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 2:26 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This sum is based upon, inter alia, the Husband's current earnings and business, the parties' pre-divorce lifestyle, the Husband's required payment of pendente lite maintenance for four years, and the fact that the Wife is currently employed (see Graves v. [read post]