Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor*"
Results 121 - 140
of 202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2012, 12:42 pm
A&M U. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:25 pm
In the heart of the opinion, the Federal Circuit rejected an approach to permissive joinder that finds its roots in MyMail, Ltd. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Thanks to Brian U. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
Gosbee v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 8:24 am
Louisiana, 419 U. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
The post included the full address and a photo of Casey’s home, which is also where he works, causing him to fear for his family’s safety. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
25 May 2020, 6:30 am
The other is that Texas v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
The program for this week's American Political History Conference includes many items of note for readers of this blog. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:15 am
Bristol-Myers SquibbJudge Wood’s only opinion regarding medical devices, Schrott v. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 2:31 am
Slip Op. 50119(U)(N.Y.Sup. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 4:43 am
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm
This week’s other new (apparent) relist, American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
That understanding was shaken when I read Phil Dixon’s summary of United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm
Internet and Social Media Germany’s competition authority, the Bundeskartellamt, has placed restrictions on Facebook’s data-processing activities. [read post]
