Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 199
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
Clearview AI, a 2020 lawsuit alleging violation of Illinois residents’ privacy rights under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act  EFF’s amicus brief in ACLU v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm by Michael Lowe
  Lots of folk may be excited to watch Usher’s Super Bowl 58 Halftime show (and maybe catching glimpses of Taylor Swift if the Chiefs become AFC champions). [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 4:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Rothstein v Krane LLP 2024 NY Slip Op 30016(U) January 3, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 157694/2017 Judge: Gerald Lebovits is that very rare species of summary judgment in a legal malpractice case in favor of plaintiff. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Soni v Pryor, 102 AD3d 856, 858 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:47 am by Eugene Volokh
"] From the decision earlier this month by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain (S.D.N.Y.) in Hong v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:34 am by Howard Knopf
Taylors opinion piece blatantly demonstrates. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:17 am by Phil Dixon
Taylor Slip op. at 797. 490-day delay between arrest and trial did not violate Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial rights U.S. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Vox and the BBC covered Twitter’s U-turn. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]