Search for: "U. S. v. Valdez" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2009, 1:10 pm
ADMIRALTY, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, OIL & GAS LAW, TRANSPORTATION Polar Tankers, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Valdez convinced plaintiffs that, rather than acquire the property directly, they should instead assign the right to purchase the property to Valdez and ultimately close through Valdezs entity, Kislev. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 4:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Valdez convinced plaintiffs that, rather than acquire the property directly, they should instead assign the right to purchase the property to Valdez and ultimately close through Valdezs entity, Kislev. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Williams, we posted that the writing was clearly on the wall to the effect that punitive damages had "peaked out" in American law.That conclusion was strongly supported in the US Supreme Court's recent decision in the Exxon Valdez punitive damages case, Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 12:03 pm by Susan Brenner
Valdez made a U-turn, drove back, and stopped in front of Villa's group. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
For the Georgia case’s purposes, the most relevant is Supremacy Clause immunity. [read post]