Search for: "U. S. v. Wallen" Results 1 - 1 of 1
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2008, 10:35 am
However, the representation must be related to the specific area that is the subject of the malpractice claim (id. at 168) and "there must be clear indicia of an ongoing continuous, developing, and dependent relationship between the client and the attorney'" (Aaron v Roemer, Wallens & Mineaux, 272 AD2d 752, 754 [2000], lv dismissed 96 NY2d 730 [2001], quoting Luk Lamellen U. [read post]