Search for: "U. S. v. Weaver"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2009, 4:17 am
Using a global positioning device to track the location of individuals while at workPeople v Weaver, 2009 NY Slip Op 03762, Decided on May 12, 2009, Court of AppealsA number disciplinary actions taken against employees were initiated by, or relied upon, the use of global positioning equipment installed in the employer's vehicle or in the employer-issued cell phone. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 8:04 am
Luxshare, Ltd. and Alixpartners, LLP, et al., v. the Fund for Protection of Investor’s Rights in Foreign States. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
Weaver, E. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Jones, 132 S. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:44 am
Earlier New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, ruled that the warrantless installation of a GPS device to track an individual suspected of criminal activity was barred by New York State’s Constitution [see People v Weaver, 12 NY3d 433,]. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 7:40 am
VW Contributor: Alex Rainville © 2019 Vandenack Weaver LLC For more information, Contact Us [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:04 am
U. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 11:43 am
Still, the odd facts of Weaver v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:41 am
Weaver, supra (citing Theofel v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:47 pm
In South Dakota v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 3:46 pm
Luckily, Tennessee's Costitution has greater protectons than the U. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 3:16 pm
In so doing, the court rejected the same argument advanced in this case by Crosswhite based on the Virginia Supreme Court decision in Weaver v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 1:05 am
[See, also, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Local 1000, and County of Nassau (Department Of Public Works), U-27544, 6/26/08].However, the decision in the Weaver case, People v Weaver, 12 NY3d 433, may have an impact on the use of GPS equipment, or the evidence obtained from such devices, in administrative disciplinary hearings.The Weaver decision indicates that “In the early morning hours of December 21, 2005, a State Police Investigator… [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 4:25 am
The Appellate Division noted that in a case decided after OIG had concluded its investigation of Cunningham, a majority in the Court of Appeals held that, within the context of a criminal investigation, "[u]nder our State Constitution, in the absence of exigent circumstances, the installation and use of a GPS device to monitor an individual's whereabouts requires a warrant supported by probable cause" (People v Weaver, 12 NY3d 433 [2009]). [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 5:00 am
Plaintiffs in the case of Advocate Health Care Network v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 7:41 am
On June 30, 2020, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:57 am
S. 438 (1928), overruled by Katz v. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:17 am
Wednesday’s other grants included: Chiaverini v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 9:01 am
Weaver, 636 F. [read post]
