Search for: "U. S. v. Young" Results 1 - 20 of 383
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 2:10 pm by CivPro Blogger
Per Justice Scalia’s majority opinion (joined by Justices Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Sotomayor), the case “consider[s] whether Ex parte Young, 209 U. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 9:32 am by Kent Scheidegger
Stewart, No. 09-529.We consider whether Ex parte Young, 209 U. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 12:00 am by Liz Overton
 On July 1, 2014, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Young v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:14 pm
As I will explain, dicta in this Court's decision in Coker v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
S. 542, a company was held to have violated Title VII by refusing to hire women with young children, despite the fact that the discrimination also depended on being a parent of young children and the fact that the company favored hiring women over men. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
S. 542, a company was held to have violated Title VII by refusing to hire women with young children, despite the fact that the discrimination also depended on being a parent of young children and the fact that the company favored hiring women over men. [read post]