Search for: "U.S. POSTAL SERVICE v. LETTER CARRIERS" Results 21 - 33 of 33
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2006, 5:37 am
[T]he sender or receiver of a closed letter or package actually relinquishes control of the container and cannot immediately repossess the letter or package -- it is in the physical possession of the postal carrier and/or common carrier outside the dominion and control of the sender or recipient. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 5:44 am by John Hochfelder
Postal Service) for almost three months, development of incisional hernia and painful internal scars following the second surgery, and several months of post-operative wound care. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Ryan P. Phair
In all of the filed cases, the complaint alleges that the retailer violated California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) by charging S&H fees that exceeded the cost of shipping through the postal service. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Ryan P. Phair and Carter C. Simpson
In all of the filed cases, the complaint alleges that the retailer violated California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) by charging S&H fees that exceeded the cost of shipping through the postal service. [read post]
6 May 2020, 8:45 am by Joy Waltemath
Postal Service sought to require letter carriers to spend more time on the street; and where an employer sought to implement a policy requiring all employees to receive flu shots as a condition of employment. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm by Robert Liles
  1984:  More than $1,000,000 was embezzled by officials of an FEHBP funded postal health care payor plan. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:29 am by John Elwood
After a thirty-five-year career as a letter carrier, the petitioner in Green v. [read post]