Search for: "U.S. v. Baker Hughes, Inc." Results 21 - 34 of 34
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2011, 8:03 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,390,193 entitled DOWNHOLE CONNECTOR FOR PRODUCTION TUBING AND CONTROL LINE AND METHOD and owned by Baker Hughes. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 8:03 am by Stefanie Levine
Patent No. 6,390,193 entitled DOWNHOLE CONNECTOR FOR PRODUCTION TUBING AND CONTROL LINE AND METHOD and owned by Baker Hughes. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
Supreme Court, and agreed that the FTC had made out a prima facie case under the burden-shifting framework commonly attributed to Baker Hughes. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am by John Elwood
City of Boise, 15-493 (whether the Idaho Supreme Court correctly concluded that the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 2:35 pm by Rob Robinson
The McNulty Memorandum, released in 2006, stated that prosecutors could only request privilege waivers if there was a “legitimate need” for the privileged information, and that if a legitimate need existed after going through a multi-factor analysis, prosecutors should seek the least intrusive waiver necessary to complete a thorough investigation.[4] The Filip Memorandum, not a memorandum per se, made revisions in 2008 to the U.S. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am by Broc Romanek
Among the companies that have successfully used the (i)(9) argument recently to exclude special meeting proposals are: CVS Caremark, Medco, Honeywell, NiSource, Baker Hughes, Becton Dickinson & Co., Eastman Chemical, and Safeway. [read post]