Search for: "U.S. v. Burns" Results 1 - 20 of 1,565
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2010, 7:37 am by On the Net
In both Texas v Johnson and US v Eichman, the court ruled that free speech trumped any offense and/or concerns about public safety raised by burning the American flag. [read post]
27 May 2010, 11:48 am by mjpetro
Black, 538 U.S. 343 (2003), for a lengthy discussion about the history of cross burning, especially by the KKK. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:26 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Paul, 505 U.S., at 402, n. 4 (White, J., concurring in judgment) (citing Brandenburg v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:22 pm by Legal Talk Network
Inc., the 2nd U.S Circuit Court of Appeals sided with a group of eight states, the City of New York and various environmental groups, who had filed a public nuisance lawsuit against five of the nation’s biggest coal-burning utilities. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 1:08 pm
 Or at least they realized the likely futility of arguing otherwise.So the U.S. decided to ask for 15 months rather than 9. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 2:28 pm by Jamison Koehler
As the Navy Times puts it, “The civil cases – 58 separate class actions and individual suits known as Alan Metzger et al v. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 5:14 am by INFORRM
  As is well known, First Amendment protection extends to expressive conduct such as flag burning (see, eg, United States v Eichman 496 US 310 (1990)) and to conduct which is grossly offensive – such as demonstrators in Nazi uniforms marching through a Jewish community (Smith v Collin 439 U.S. 916 (1978)). [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:05 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
USACE and USFOR-A provided us with written comments, which are reproduced in appendices IV and V, respectively. [read post]