Search for: "U.S. v. Certain Funds in Uk"
Results 1 - 20
of 98
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2022, 10:22 pm
UK court records show a couple of Ericsson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:52 am
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:06 am
With the amendments, the final UK regulations implementing AIFMD would permit “existing” U.S. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:06 am
With the amendments, the final UK regulations implementing AIFMD would permit “existing” U.S. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
This can be seen in the leading case on appeal standards in UK telecoms regulation, BT and CityFibre v Ofcom, which—prior to the move to judicial review for such cases—involved deregulation to help encourage innovation in regional business centers (Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, etc.). [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am
U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 12:45 pm
The post 3 Count: Batman v Superman v Piracy appeared first on Plagiarism Today. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:04 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v, National Australia Bank – which held that the U.S. securities laws do not apply to securities transactions that take place outside the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
SECONDARY MARKETS (Non-Bank Entities) Holders of a funded participation under a financial entity relying on a UK-authorised passport might consider the following, particularly in jurisdictions which require a banking licence to perform certain lending activities: What action has the financial entity taken? [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:40 pm
CNET Networks, Inc. and Levitt Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Rose-Ackerman’s view at times seems superficially closer to the majority view expressed by the Supreme Court in INS v Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, which found that a legislative veto over an agency decision was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:26 am
Gilead's SPC for Truvada based on the European patent EP0915894 was found by Mr Justice Arnold in the UK High Court to contravene Article 3(a) of the SPC Regulation (Teva v Gilead [2018] EWHC 2416 (Pat)). [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:21 pm
Supreme Court in its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
Statements must be sent to the fund or, in certain cases, investors in the fund, within 120 days after the fund’s fiscal year end. [read post]
27 May 2020, 2:02 pm
In the recent case of Tecnicas Reunidas Saudia (TRS) v The Korea Development Bank (the Bank), for which the judgment was published last week, the High Court, Queen’s Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court (the TCC)) considered a demand guarantee executed by the Bank in favor of TRS, which formed part of an agreement around certain advance payments made by TRS to a subcontractor. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
In addition, on November 22, 2022, the U.S. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
Certain countries, including the UK, Sweden and Germany (for existing funds as of July 22, 2013), are allowing a one-year transitional period delaying the application of the AIMFD to non-EU managers. [read post]