Search for: "U.S. v. Certain Funds in Uk"
Results 1 - 20
of 89
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2022, 10:22 pm
UK court records show a couple of Ericsson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:52 am
Supreme Court decision in Morrison v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:06 am
With the amendments, the final UK regulations implementing AIFMD would permit “existing” U.S. [read post]
31 May 2023, 10:58 am
This can be seen in the leading case on appeal standards in UK telecoms regulation, BT and CityFibre v Ofcom, which—prior to the move to judicial review for such cases—involved deregulation to help encourage innovation in regional business centers (Leeds, Manchester, Birmingham, etc.). [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am
U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 12:45 pm
The post 3 Count: Batman v Superman v Piracy appeared first on Plagiarism Today. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 4:04 am
Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v, National Australia Bank – which held that the U.S. securities laws do not apply to securities transactions that take place outside the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 1:25 am
SECONDARY MARKETS (Non-Bank Entities) Holders of a funded participation under a financial entity relying on a UK-authorised passport might consider the following, particularly in jurisdictions which require a banking licence to perform certain lending activities: What action has the financial entity taken? [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:40 pm
CNET Networks, Inc. and Levitt Corp. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 6:57 am
At least that’s what a Magistrate Judge in the District of New Jersey decided last week in Harish v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
Second, the Act authorizes (but does not require) the President to seize any such assets within U.S. jurisdiction for the purpose of transferring those funds to the Ukraine Support Fund, which will be used to fund humanitarian efforts in Ukraine and Ukraine’s reconstruction and rebuilding efforts. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 6:30 am
Rose-Ackerman’s view at times seems superficially closer to the majority view expressed by the Supreme Court in INS v Chadha, 462 U.S. 919, which found that a legislative veto over an agency decision was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:09 am
Mermeren v Fox ISir Robin Jacob calls for System 2 thinking for patent law I Florence court prohibits unauthorized commercial use of David's image I Thursday Thingies [Week ending 3 December] Clash of the beer pongs - Breakthrough Funding Ltd v Nearby Media Ltd I WTO establishes panel to examine Qatar’s complaint against UAE I What's next for trade marks in the UK and EU? [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 5:26 am
Gilead's SPC for Truvada based on the European patent EP0915894 was found by Mr Justice Arnold in the UK High Court to contravene Article 3(a) of the SPC Regulation (Teva v Gilead [2018] EWHC 2416 (Pat)). [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 6:21 pm
Supreme Court in its 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 3:31 pm
Statements must be sent to the fund or, in certain cases, investors in the fund, within 120 days after the fund’s fiscal year end. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
In addition, on November 22, 2022, the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 9:07 am
Certain countries, including the UK, Sweden and Germany (for existing funds as of July 22, 2013), are allowing a one-year transitional period delaying the application of the AIMFD to non-EU managers. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm
The claim arises from allegations that Ping-chung received funding from China for pro-unification propaganda. [read post]
