Search for: "U.S. v. Davis (sandy)"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
Karlan[1] On the eve of the Supreme Court’s hearing Davis v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Davis v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In Texas v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 6:30 am
Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962), and affirmed the analysis and holding of the Magistrate in Young as not "clearly erroneous or contrary to the law". [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am
NPS contracted with Nagan Construction (Nagan) to repair storm damage caused by Super Storm Sandy. [read post]
5 May 2017, 1:45 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Death penalty cases leading U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
College London"Feminism v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
The U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:59 am
His decision on circuit in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
But wisdom was in short supply in Jefferson Davis’s cabinet. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:26 pm
’ ‘McCain v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
RE Broker 2 John Brancato U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
