Search for: "U.S. v. Higgins*" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2014, 2:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
An explanation of the significance of new effect in established patent law can be found as long ago as 1822 in Evans v Eaton 20 U.S. 356 (1822) and its evidential nature was explained by Justice Bradley in Webster Loom v Higgins105 US 580 (1881), subsequently approved e.g. by Justice Brown in Carnegie Steel v Cambria Iron Co 185 US 402 (1902): It may be laid down as a general rule, though perhaps not an invariable one, that if a new combination and… [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by John Dean
While there is a so-called “political question” doctrine, first established in Luther v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]