Search for: "U.S. v. Jenkins" Results 201 - 220 of 361
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2012, 6:39 am by Rob Robinson
§1920 – bit.ly/HewRoz (Mark Sidoti) PhotoCop & The Red Light of Admissibility - bit.ly/H18QVF (Josh Gilliland) Pippins v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
bit.ly/xlv94n (Mikki Tomlinson) Understanding ESI Concept, Scope Imperative to Effective Client Representation Says ABA Panelists – bit.ly/AjbmzK (ABA Now) U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
In all of these cases, the government has lost this argument.It is not at all surprising that since Preseault I, 494 U.S. 1 (1990), and Preseault II, 100 F.3d 1525 (Fed. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
An exellent article written by Duke University Third Year law strudent, Edward Boeme, Warrantless GPS in U.S. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:03 am by PaulKostro
Jenkins, 178 N.J. 347, 359 (2004) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Teledyne Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:55 pm by Lovechilde
As Alan Jenkins, Executive Director of The Opportunity Agenda, and a former law clerk to Judge Carter writes: Judge Carter was a primary architect behind the U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:44 am by Paralegal Mentor
Missouri v Jenkins 491 U.S. 274 (1989) http://supreme.justia.com/us/491/274/case.html Richlin v Chertof  http://www.nala.org/New2/Upload/file/PDF-Files/08-Richlin-Decision.pdf Courts do not automatically approve fees for paralegal time. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]