Search for: "U.S. v. Jose Lopez" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am by Joel R. Brandes
Despite several requests by the Petitioner, Jose Enrique Lopez Sanchez and Miriam Lopez Sanchez refused to return the children to Petitioner. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 10:44 am by Elliot Setzer
Maikel Jose Moreno Perez, Case No. 20-2407JJO: Criminal Complaint United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:02 am
Souter wrote the opinion for the Court in Lopez v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:05 pm
Miranda–Lopez, 532 F.3d 1034, 1037, 1040 (9th Cir. 2008).U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 5:43 am by Stephen Mayeaux
The following is a guest post by Silvia Lopez, who served as a fall 2021 remote intern transcribing and researching documents in the Herencia: Centuries of Spanish Legal Documents crowdsourcing campaign at the Law Library of Congress. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 2:25 pm
Miranda–Lopez, 532 F.3d 1034, 1037, 1040 (9th Cir. 2008).U.S. v Doe, supra. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 6:37 am by Anna Christensen
” The Court rejected the Fifth Circuit’s reliance on its decision in Lopez v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 12:21 pm by CJLF Staff
  Howard Mintz of the San Jose Mercury News reports that U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 5:30 am
Atlanta, GA Julio Lopez-De Dips, A206 011 402 (BIA Mar. 1, 2016) (2016 WL 1084489) - The BIA remanded the matter to the IJ for reconsideration of the respondent’s motion to continue in light of the respondent’s marriage to a U.S. citizen and the U.S. citizen spouse’s plans to file an I-130 for respondent. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am by Law Lady
State Farm Lloyds, 202 S.W.3d 744 (Tex. 2006).Chinese Drywall: CHINESE DRYWALL-RELATED LOSS NOT AN 'ACCIDENT' FOR COVERAGE PURPOSES, Lopez v. [read post]