Search for: "U.S. v. Kelly (john)" Results 41 - 60 of 258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
On Monday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Kirtsaeng v John Wiley & Sons, a case dealing with the impact of copyright’s first sale doctrine — 17 USC § 109(a) — on the Copyright Act’s importation prohibition — 17 USC § 602(a)(1). [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Carrie Cordero provided Part II of her thoughts about making national security arguments in court, this time with advice for Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly. [read post]
10 Dec 2016, 6:42 am by Quinta Jurecic
And April Doss defended the 9th Circuit’s reading of the government’s ability to use information collected through 702 surveillance in U.S. v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 6:21 am by Hayley Evans
John Kelly, the White House chief of staff, will oversee a meeting between officials from the FBI, the Justice Department, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, and the congressional leadership to review sensitive documents about the informant. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The Washington Times, Kelly Shackelford bemoans recent “effort[s] to weaken the legitimacy of the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
John Elwood finally reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 1:38 pm by William Ford
While Chief of Staff John Kelly did not sign the memo outlining the changes to the clearance process, President Trump delegated the decision to his chief of staff last week. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 5:56 am by Joy Waltemath
all materials directly or indirectly considered by former Secretary of DHS John Kelly leading to his February 2017 memorandum not to rescind DACA. [read post]