Search for: "U.S. v. Mena"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2008, 4:59 am
Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 161 L. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:45 am
Note: Australia, Canada and Sweden recently announced they will resume their funding of UNRWA.Related posts:- Regional Focus: MENA - Pt. 1 (Gaza) (29 Feb. 2024)- Regional Focus: MENA - Pt. 2 (29 Feb. 2024) [read post]
3 Jan 2009, 6:48 am
Galvan-Mena, 2008 U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:46 pm
Cruz-Rivera, 2006 U.S. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:24 pm
Mena cannot be applied to a traffic stop, following State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:21 am
Larry Schwartz won in State v. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
Mena may constitutionally detain the occupants of a home during a parole or probation compliance search. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:14 am
Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 98 (2005) ("An officer's authority to detain incident to a search is categorical; it does not depend on the quantum of proof justifying detention or the extent of the intrusion to be imposed by the seizure. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 101 (2005), content of police questions posed during lawful detention does not implicate Fourth Amendment as long as those questions do not prolong detention.Read the opinion here. [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:15 am
Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982) [preprint]- Chapter 10: Commentary on Zadvydas v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 4:51 am
Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 101 (2005) (citing Illinois v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 3:39 am
Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005). [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm
Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005), and Arizona v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 5:54 am
Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 125 S. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:10 am
Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005). [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 4:47 am
Mena is a search warrant case and a detention of a person at the search. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 10:03 am
The Honorable Judge Daniel Bress Class dismissed.United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 10:30 am
Supreme Court announced its decision in Sale v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 6:36 am
Mena, 544 U.S. 93, 125 S. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:38 pm
Mena, 544 U.S. 93 (2005).Well, despite its assertion, the Court had never made such a thing plain. [read post]
