Search for: "U.S. v. Rojas"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 8:30 am
Businesses whose employees are the targets of violent stalkers or jealous exes, or perhaps even the targets themselves, g., Rojas v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Although you wouldn’t know it from watching the news many of the 677 federal judges in the U.S. are working on cases that don’t deal with how to count votes. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm
The Ninth Circuit has given us some unique FOIA decisions in recent years—think of Rojas v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 7:55 am
Presumably, the U.S. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 11:29 am
(4) Rojas v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:21 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 8:42 am
In Rojas v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Virginia, the U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 8:17 am
Virginia, the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 7:41 am
Unsurprisingly, in Preap, the government urges deference to the agency’s interpretation of the statute in Rojas, citing to Chevron v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 11:04 am
In a recent case Mendez-Rojas v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 5:19 pm
Martinez issued an 18-page order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in the Mendez Rojas v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 6:58 pm
Rojas-Vega v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:45 am
The U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 7:18 pm
International Trade Commission, "Overview of Cuban Imports of Goods and Services and Effects of U.S. [read post]
26 May 2016, 9:29 pm
Of course there is the Davis and Welch Show — that is, the Annual Review of U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:19 am
The U.S. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
https://t.co/bGMN6YpnxR -> Google Can Derive Undisclosed Economic Benefits From CAPTCHAs–Rojas-Lozano v. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
It’s Hard to Measure https://t.co/phkXQiT7kE via @itifdc -> No expectation of privacy in subscriber information, R. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 8:13 am
Cavazos, (9th Cir., March 20, 2015), the 9th Circuit held that the district court properly dismissed an inmate's free exercise claim because he failed to allege facts showing that the confiscation of his television substantially burdened the practice of his religion.In Rojas v. [read post]
