Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF LOUISIANA" Results 401 - 420 of 2,405
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2022, 9:37 am by Tom Smith
Because of this censorship, Bhattacharya and Kulldorff are now plaintiffs in Missouri v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:25 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Campbell On January 2, 2018, State Attorneys General from eleven states (Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Wisconsin) (collectively the States) filed a friend of the court brief in Nat’l Ass’n of Wheat Growers v. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 9:05 am
As some may know, Louisiana over a decade ago upheld the facial constitutionality of the death penalty for child rapists in State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 5:55 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 173926 (WD LA, Oct. 9, 2018), a Louisiana federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2018 U.S. [read post]
28 May 2020, 12:19 pm by Unknown
Cranford (Reserved Water Rights) State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPamela J. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
Louisiana, a capital case scheduled for oral argument in January. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:51 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
On January 5, 2011, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana issued a Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order in the case of Big R Towing v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 10:31 am by NARF
Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana (Remand to State Court; Tribal Sovereign Immunity) Swinomish Indian Tribal Community v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 10:16 pm
"Recently, the Arizona Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:00 am
The Court previously upheld the Oregon approach (which, like Louisiana but unlike the 48 other states, allows "split-verdicts") in Apodaca v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 12:00 am by Raymond G. Lahoud
Once again, immigration policy finds itself in the spotlight, as the United States Supreme Court recently heard oral argument for United States v. [read post]