Search for: "U.S. v. Sherman" Results 121 - 140 of 1,102
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2010, 12:32 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Park & Sons Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911), that made minimum resale price agreements ("RPM agreements," also called "vertical price-fixing") per se illegal under the Sherman Act, in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 10:08 am by Audrey A Millemann
Qualcomm Inc., 935 F.3d 752, 755 (Aug. 23, 2019), quoting Verizon Communications Inc. v. the Law Offices of Trinko, 540 U.S. 398, 408 (2004). [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 6:00 am by Ryan Goellner
Last week, the Sixth Circuit issued its opinion affirming summary judgment for the defendants in Hyland v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 9:31 am by Susan I. Nelson
Caldwell and Christopher Sherman (AP) McALLEN (AP) — A federal judge in Brownsville said in a recent order that the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 8:04 am by msW1Ld
Park & Sons, Co., 220 U.S. 373 (1911), which held that resale maintenance is a per se violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:20 pm by Anna Christensen
This morning, the Court handed down its opinion in United States v. [read post]