Search for: "U.S. v. Watkins"
Results 21 - 40
of 319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 11:01 pm
”The case cite is Watkins v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:39 pm
Watkins Inc. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 3:39 pm
Watkins Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 12:44 pm
Watkins Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:33 am
Adler) The University of Texas at Austin has retained Latham & Watkins to defend its affirmative action policy before the U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:26 am
Watkins, 2009 U.S. [read post]
4 May 2008, 3:34 pm
More of Brady v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 8:10 am
In DePaola v. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 2:30 am
v=vUxGzDFCCho [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:13 pm
The court also cited U.S. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 5:15 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:20 am
Zachary, supra (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 8:05 pm
Watkins Law & Advocacy v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 2:15 pm
Plaintiff claimed that his free exercise rights were violated by authorities' insistence that he cut his dreadlocks because they pose a security risk.In Watkins v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 4:09 pm
LEXIS 175988 (SD IL, Oct. 24, 2017), an Illinois federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that he was not allowed to observe the Ramadan fast.In Watkins v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:00 pm
Robert Elwyn Watkins v Philip James Woolas [2010] EWHC 2702 (QB) 5 November 2010- read judgment The Election Court has ruled that the Labour MP for Oldham knowingly and deliberately misled the constituency and as a result his election is void under Section 106 of the Representation of the People Act (1983). [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 7:27 am
LEXIS 122679 (WD NC, Sept. 15, 2015), a North Carolina federal district court gave plaintiff inmate 20 days to submit evidence that he exhausted administrative remedies in seeking a vegan diet for religious reasons.In Watkins v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 7:48 pm
(Roper, supra, 445 U.S. at p. 338, fn. 9.) [read post]
30 May 2015, 11:03 am
"U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 6:34 am
Last week, in Al Razak v. [read post]
