Search for: "UHS Receivables Corp" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm by SCOTUStalk
Deanne Maynard, co-chair of Morrison & Foerster’s Appellate and Supreme Court practice, has argued 14 cases before the Supreme Court since her first oral argument in 2004. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm by Wolfgang Demino
See UH's announcement here.Victims of the strong-armed tactics involving the systematic use of the criminal justice system to collect high-interest loans brought malicious prosecution and DTPA class action claims against lender (technically, a credit-access business (CAB) under Texas law, since the exorbitant finance charges would otherwise violate the state's usury laws), and the defendants were successful in convincing the lower court of appeals in San Antonio to compel the… [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 4:36 am by Gritsforbreakfast
In October, 14.5 percent received personal bonds, county records show. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 9:33 am by Venkat Balasubramani
[Eric’s introduction: ever since the Ninth Circuit mishandled the already-muddled definitions of “clickwrap” and “browsewrap” in the Nguyen case, we’ve seen a steady decline in the coherence of the law of online contract formation. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 8:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
As a result, the person now receiving Twitter’s SMS updates did not opt-in to receive them. [read post]
1 May 2015, 9:19 am by John Elwood
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted cases. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
GC: (a bit embarrassed) Uh…it’s been a couple of days. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:54 am by Venkat Balasubramani
For example, the court says: where the website contains an explicit textual notice that continued use will act as a manifestation of the user’s intent to be bound, courts have been more amenable to enforcing browsewrap agreements Uh, no. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 1:51 pm by Ron Coleman
McDonald's Corp., 18 USPQ2d 1889 (Fed. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:26 pm by Kim Zetter
” Manning is an Army soldier, and the case against him is being handled by the Army, not the Marine Corps, which the Army had said was another reason for the move. [read post]